Advantages Of A Collaborative Role Among Organizations Essay

Advantages Of A Collaborative Role Among Organizations - Essay Example Collaboration is beneficial among organizations due to the results it yields for both organizations and their clients. Collaboration refers to the relationship between independent organizations that involves coming together to share in either resources or ideas. It often occurs when organizations believe they can accomplish more when together than when they are independent entities. Once organizations come together and work as one, they pose a threat to their competition. This is because; they work as one towards a common goal and do not have to compete against each other. It also increases the rate and speed of innovation for organizations that collaborate, as they share information and ideas openly. Collaboration, also, brings together organizations with different capabilities in regard to the resources they can access. Therefore, upon forming a cooperative relationship, they tend to advance their abilities and skills. From this, their competitiveness improves and so does their sur vival in the market. This is particularly so for organizations with fewer resources, but have immense potential to be successful once they work together with those who have resources. Collaborative roles among and between organizations are beneficial to all firms involved as they come together to lessen the risk incurred to any of them when working alone. Collaboration creates a safety net for all involved, as they can contribute to bailing each other out. Clients enjoy increased reliability from all organizations involved in the collaboration.

Engineering and environmental materials Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Engineering and environmental materials - Essay Example These two lanes of traffic were to be constructed on the lower deck level of the bridge. The same conclusion had already been given by Bristol city council. The second recommendation by the group was the removal of the upper part of the bridge that comprises of the stiffening plates. The third conclusion was that the weight of the proposed cantilever beam of the footway could be adequately and safely supported by the bridge. The method of analysis employed by Halcrow Group Ltd was SAM. In this analysis method, the individual members of the bridge were modeled in collaboration with section properties. The section properties were obtained from site measurements as well as original drawing scripts. In determination of the section properties of the individual members, assumption was made on their ultimate tensile strengths (UTS). These sections were accredited with low ultimate tensile strength of the main members. 2D Diagrams of the bridge A. Bridge in current use B. Cross section of th e Bridge The assumption in the model for the bridge in use is that the movable part is able to move freely along x-x axis since the diagram is in 2D. The movable part has 4 degrees of freedom. The second degree of freedom is in y-y axis during lifting up and down with the help of a crane. The rationale of the movable structure of the bridge is to allow space for recreational activities within the stream .The stationary parts are fixed to a rigid base. The assumption of the cross section model is that the reaction and action are equal and opposite. The reaction of the principal structure in the footway is capable to accommodate the weight of the pedestrians. The same applies to the principal structure in the traffic lane. Since the lane is two-way traffic, the principal structures are assumed to possess double tensile strength so as to withstand the weights of the vehicles. The rationale of the second model is to provide maximum utilization of the bridge. Most of bridges are construc ted with one rationale that is to provide footway for the pedestrian. However, that is not the case in Ashton Bridge. This bridge is designed so as to provide maximum utilization. The moment of inertia is great so as to withstand the action force (Domone & ILLston, 2010). Evaluation of the actions of the proposed bridge A. Pedestrian and cycle traffic The pedestrians would be inconvenient with the proposed repairs and maintenance. The cantilevering of the footway with steel beam supports and decking will mean indefinite closure of the existing footway. This information is obtained from Halcrow Group Ltd rapid transit report. The cycle traffic will also be affected. This is because of the removal of the corroded deck plates together with the concrete decking. B. Bus loading Bus loading will also be affected. This is because of the proposed cutting of top corner stiffening plates. The ultimate action will be increased headroom for loading buses. C. Self weight A lot of interference wi ll not be caused to the bridge self weight. This is because during all the proposed operations the rigid base of the bridge will not be interfered with. As indicated in the report the proposed new carriageway will be constructed on the existing steel deck plate before the deck plates are replaced. The overall weight of the bridge will increase due to the addition of the drainage modifications and